英語(yǔ)聽(tīng)力 學(xué)英語(yǔ),練聽(tīng)力,上聽(tīng)力課堂! 注冊(cè) 登錄
> 在線聽(tīng)力 > 有聲讀物 > 英語(yǔ)美文 > 四級(jí)晨讀主題美文100篇 >  第26篇

四級(jí)晨讀主題美文100篇 26

所屬教程:四級(jí)晨讀主題美文100篇

瀏覽:

手機(jī)版
掃描二維碼方便學(xué)習(xí)和分享
https://online2.tingclass.net/lesson/shi0529/0008/8424/26.mp3
https://image.tingclass.net/statics/js/2012

Love Is Not Like Merchandise

A reader in Florida apparently2 bruised3 by some personal experience, writes in to complain, “If I steal a nickel’s4 worth of merchandise, I am a thief and punished; but if I steal the love of another’s wife, I am free.”

This is a prevalent5 misconception in many people’s minds — that love, like merchandise, can be “stolen”. Numerous states, in fact, have enacted6 laws allowing damages for “alienation of affections7”.

But love is not a commodity; the real thing cannot be bought, sold, traded or stolen. It is an act of the will, a turning of the emotions, a change in the climate of the personality.

When a husband or wife is “stolen” by another person, that husband or wife was already ripe for the stealing, and was already predisposed8 toward a new partner. The “lovebandit9” was only taking what was waiting to be taken, what wanted to be taken.

We tend to treat persons like goods. We even speak of children “belonging” to their parents. But nobody “belongs” to anyone else. Each person belongs to himself. Children are entrusted10 to their parents, and if their parents do not treat them properly, the state has a right to remove them from their parents’ trusteeship11.

Most of us, when young, had the experience of a sweetheart being taken from us by somebody more attractive and more appealing12. At the time, we may have resented this intruder—but as we grew older, we recognized that the sweetheart had never been ours to begin with13. It was not the intruder that “caused” the break, but the lack of a real relationship.

On the surface, many marriages seem to break up because of a “third party.” This is, however, a psychological14 illusion15. The other woman or the other man merely serves as a pretext16 for dissolving a marriage that had already lost its essential integrity17.

愛(ài)情不是商品

一位佛羅里達(dá)州讀者顯然是在個(gè)人經(jīng)歷上受過(guò)創(chuàng)傷,他寫(xiě)信來(lái)抱怨道:“如果我偷走了五分錢(qián)的商品,我就是個(gè)賊,要受到懲罰;但是如果我偷走了他人妻子的愛(ài)情,我沒(méi)事兒。”

這是許多人心目中普遍存在的一種錯(cuò)覺(jué)——愛(ài)情,像商品一樣,可以“偷走”。實(shí)際上,許多州都頒布法令,允許索取“情感轉(zhuǎn)讓”賠償金。

但是愛(ài)情并不是商品;真情實(shí)意不可能買(mǎi)到、賣(mài)掉、交換,或者偷走。愛(ài)情是一種意愿的行為,是感情的轉(zhuǎn)向,是個(gè)性上的變化。

當(dāng)丈夫或妻子被另一個(gè)人“偷走”時(shí),那個(gè)丈夫或妻子就已經(jīng)具備了被偷走的條件,事先已經(jīng)準(zhǔn)備接受新的伴侶了。這位“愛(ài)匪”不過(guò)是取走等人取走、盼人取走的東西。

我們往往待人如物。我們甚至說(shuō)孩子“屬于”父母。但是誰(shuí)也不“屬于”誰(shuí)。人都屬于自己。孩子是托付給父母的,如果父母不善待他們,政府有權(quán)取消父母對(duì)他們的托管身份。

我們多數(shù)人年輕時(shí)都有過(guò)戀人被某個(gè)更有魅力、更迷人的人奪去的經(jīng)歷。在當(dāng)時(shí),我們興許怨恨這位不速之客——但是后來(lái)長(zhǎng)大了,也就認(rèn)識(shí)到了心上人本來(lái)就不屬于我們。并不是不速之客 “導(dǎo)致了”決裂,而是缺乏真正的感情。

從表面上看,許多婚姻似乎是因?yàn)橛辛?“第三者”才破裂的。然而這是一種心理上的錯(cuò)覺(jué)。另外那個(gè)女人,或者另外那個(gè)男人,無(wú)非是作為借口,用來(lái)解除早就不是完好無(wú)損的婚姻罷了。

用戶搜索

瘋狂英語(yǔ) 英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法 新概念英語(yǔ) 走遍美國(guó) 四級(jí)聽(tīng)力 英語(yǔ)音標(biāo) 英語(yǔ)入門(mén) 發(fā)音 美語(yǔ) 四級(jí) 新東方 七年級(jí) 賴(lài)世雄 zero是什么意思鞍山市金第陽(yáng)光諾亞英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)交流群

網(wǎng)站推薦

英語(yǔ)翻譯英語(yǔ)應(yīng)急口語(yǔ)8000句聽(tīng)歌學(xué)英語(yǔ)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)方法

  • 頻道推薦
  • |
  • 全站推薦
  • 推薦下載
  • 網(wǎng)站推薦